August 1962, President Kennedy addresses the nation on the economy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adFjyQzCin8 |
Regular visitors to my blog -- both of you? -- know that I often post presentations and other teaching materials, and encourage their free use by colleagues for your own teaching and other non-profit activities.
My visitors, my former students, and others who've been subjected to my presentations at conferences and other events know that I have a reputation for my slide decks -- whatever you think of their quality, there's surely a lot of slides!
I've been creating slides of one kind or another for almost 50 years. When I moved from plastic transparencies and some early software to PowerPoint, I began to collect slides by topic in large files I think of as libraries.
Over the next year or two I plan to post some of these libraries. To be clear, I don't use them directly for a class or other presentation. Too many slides!!! I go through, pick out the ones I want, and often freshen them up a bit.
Today, I'm presenting a 1500 slide library on macroecnomic indicators. Since it's a large file (about 275MB) I recommend downloading the file to a hard drive, then opening in PowerPoint. Notice that many of the slides have notes below the slides themselves with some discussion, relevant links, etc.
After some introductory material on (e.g.) units of observation, periodicity, stocks and flows, seasonal adjustment and so on, we cover:
- Basic demographics
- Prices and inflation
- Gross Domestic Product
- Employment and labor market indicators
- Incomes, Poverty and Wealth
- Interest Rates and other financial indicators
If you look at today's offering you'll see that many of the slides could use some freshening. Some haven't been updated for a decade, most need at least a year or two of freshening. But I think most of the structure and much of the discussion still work.
Why this library to begin with? For the better part of three decades I taught real estate and other business students. While I once taught a principles macro course to undergraduates (to the dismay of some of my DSGE-besotted macroeconomist friends!) this teaching material came out of the realization that most business students were not going to do much formal modeling in their careers, but would benefit immensely from understanding basic market mechanisms, gains from trade, and so on -- and that they would be confronted with data, macro and otherwise.
Several of my libraries address basic concepts, and other data sources. This deck owes a lot to my late friend and colleague Don Nichols, UW macroeconomist, who was a master at presenting basic macro data and telling clear stories about how the economy was evolving. I don't claim Don's expertise, but I learned a lot from his frequent sojourns to the business school and to other non-specialist audiences.
One reason I decided to post this library today is a little darker. Like many, I'm concerned about the future of our National Income and Product Accounts, our price and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our financial data from the Federal Reserve, the mother lode that comes from the Census Bureau; and dozens of other agencies.
In addition to the data we use from the "Big Four" sources, we often rely on data on climate from NOAA, on health from the CDC, on crime from the FBI, and many other sources. For a deeper dive into the Federal Statistical System, go to StatsPolicy.gov for a good start.
What are the sources of the aforementioned concern? The U.S. statistical system, arguably the most extensive and sophisticated in the world, like any such system, has room for improvement. And there is a long history of elements of the system facing budget cuts and/or political pressure. To date, these have, in the main, been successfully blunted. And we've had improvements, from the creation of the American Housing Survey in the 70s to the 2010 move from the Census Long Form to the American Community Survey, and the implementation of the Pulse Surveys during the COVID pandemic. But the general trend in recent decades has been for an erosion in the resources devoted to, and outputs of, government statistics, as docmented in a 2025 letter from a wide range of individual and institutional data experts and users available here, and especially in a 2024 report from the American Statistical Association, "The Nation's Data at Risk: Meeting America's Information Needs for the 21st Century," available here. NYT summary here.
That does not mean that there are not important areas for improvement and reform. Presently, many areas of data collection and analysis are under threat from cuts being implemented by the (ironically labeled) Department of Government Efficiency. More on DOGE in a future post, but for now note that DOGE's modus operandi of "move fast and break things" is not designed to improve or reform statistical systems, but to disrupt. It is safe to say that the DOGE team is in many respects the Bizarro World version of the "Data at Risk" approach. You can find representative discussions of the DOGE approach to data here, here, here, here, and here.
[For those who did not grow up on U.S. comic books, Bizarro World is a fictional planet where everything is the opposite of Earth.]
As an academic, and primarily an empiricist to boot, it's fair to ask if I'm simply defending my own little world. Yes, but not "simply." "Data at Risk" is one convenient review of the importance of good public data for actually improving government efficiency, and also for business market research, risk analysis, invention and innovation, and economic development. Another review from a joint project of the Hamilton Project and the American Enterprise Institute, "In Order That They Might Rest Their Arguments on Facts: The Vital Role of Government-Collected Data" is available here.
Good data contributes to a functional polity. It's been well established that one of the characteristics of democracies is the provision of timely and accurate data. Here is one example. Economist Luis Martinez checked reported GDP growth rates to those estimated from changes in the intensity of light emitted across different countries, a proxy for energy use. These satellite surveys of light intensity have been shown to be a good independent check on economic production.
From Eberstadt et al. (2017) |
We need accurate, reliable data on a wide range of important topics. It is invaluable but it does not cost very much.
Selected References
Auerbach, Jonathan, Claire McKay Bowen, Constance F Citro, Steve Pierson, Nancy Potok, and Zachary Seeskin. "The Nation's Data at Risk: Meeting America's Information Needs for the 21st Century." Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the American Statistical Association, and George Mason University, June 2024.
Briviba, Andre, Bruno Frey, Louis Moser, and Sandro Bieri. "Governments Manipulate Official Statistics: Institutions Matter." European Journal of Political Economy 82 (2024): 102523.
Chen, Wei, Xilu Chen, Chang-Tai Hsieh, and Zheng Song. "A Forensic Examination of China’s National Accounts." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2019: 77-141.
Coremberg, Ariel. "Measuring Argentina’s GDP Growth." World Economics 15, no. 1 (2014): 1-32.
Eberstadt, Nicholas, Ryan Nunn, Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, and Michael R Strain. "“In Order That They Might Rest Their Arguments on Facts”: The Vital Role of Government-Collected Data." American Enterprise Institute and the Hamilton Project, 2017.
Georgiou, Andreas V. "The Manipulation of Official Statistics as Corruption and Ways of Understanding It." Statistical Journal of the IAOS 37, no. 1 (2021): 85-105.
Jerven, Morten. Poor Numbers: How We Are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do About It. Cornell University Press, 2013.
Martinez, Luis R. "How Much Should We Trust the Dictator’s GDP Growth Estimates?". Journal of Political Economy 130, no. 10 (2022): 2731-69.
The Economist. Turkey Grapples With Triple-Digit Inflation. July 14, 2022.